Sunday, June 19, 2011

The great thing about democracy is that it gives every voter a chance to do something stupid.



The word POLICE is coined from the first letters of certain virtues which are Greek and Latin to the whole system itself.
Politeness
Obedience
Loyalty
Integrity
Courtesy
Earnestness
It is rather shameful and painful to say that an unbelievable percent of the police officials are criminals with a very clear cut criminal background and persistent relation with notorious criminals. A candidate joining the training academy or Police training camp will have all the abstemious natures of a real human being. There upon his transition starts from the innate to the hyper-egoist, ultra brutal creature which ever yarns to earn, attack and kill, one who is sapping out the very values of all human relations and gaining in the language, outlook, expression fully cannibalistic.
It is staggering that the people entrusted to protect us from crime have criminal convictions themselves. It is even more worrying that so many police officers convicted of serious crimes involving dishonesty, violence, rape and murder have been allowed to keep their jobs. The public entrust the police with the use of legal force precisely because they are taken to be self-disciplined and restrained, which is why anyone convicted of a violent offence should be dismissed. One cannot understand how a police officer convicted of serious crimes can perform his duty effectively. The trust that is absolutely vital in policing is seriously undermined when police officers are being convicted of crimes. Allowing police officers convicted of offences of violence or dishonesty to continue serving merely brings the vast majority of law-abiding and diligent officers into disrepute and making the whole system a sepulcher for virtues. Although there are vetting procedures for dealing with new applicants, there is no home office guidance for dealing with officers committing offences while serving.
There is a disturbing lack of consistency in how police force deals with officers who are convicted of crimes. Where an officer has committed misconduct, which can include a criminal offence, a range of disciplinary actions should be taken. Each case should be judged on its merit. The force concerned should then take action depending on a range of factors including the severity of the offence and its impact on an officer's ability to carry out his duties.
What is known to the public for decades is that there a nexus between Politicians, Police and Criminal elements and there is a proliferation of criminal gangs under political and police patronage. If our Democracy is to survive the onslaught of criminal elements - the organised crime on the system, there is need to take urgent and decisive steps. Politicians, devoid of a record of service, sacrifice and a mass base, need money and muscle power to keep their positions of power and to bludgeon their constituency into submission. Criminal elements in police thrive on wrongdoings and they need someone to keep the law away from their back and heels. Once the politician reaches a particular stature and develops a clout, he dictates terms to Police and Bureaucracy much to the delight of the criminal elements. The bonds become stronger and the triads find it difficult to survive without the help of the other and the point of no return is reached.
Existing criminal laws are woefully inadequate to deal with various manifestations of organised crime. There is need for a special legislation to deal with this menace. We need special courts and suitable modifications in the Criminal Procedure to make justice swifter. A stitch in time will save nine. The inability of the criminal justice system to deal firmly with infractions like rowdyism, gambling, prostitution, drugs etc lead to development of organised crime. Yesterday’s petty criminals turn out today’s dons. Hence, the need to nip budding criminals at the early stages itself.
Police, who are the gate keepers of the mighty criminal justice system and the bureaucracy, who are the dispensers of welfare measures to the society, are at the mercy of politicians for their survival. Politician’s displeasure bring down on them harassment like frequent transfers and disruption in career advancement. Hence, they quietly toe the line of politicians. Here police and bureaucracy act as catalysts for the growth of the nexus between the politician and criminal elements. To make the police and bureaucracy people oriented and act without fear or favour, control of politicians over them should be carefully structured.
A good number of high-profile police officials are under scanner for various offenses, ranging from an alleged connection with fake stamp paper scam kingpin to much more concentrated levels. This complicity between police and underworld are more evident in land deals.
Even 6o years after independence there is widespread unrest, discontent and conflicts among a large section of the population which is leading to the threat to the rule of law in India. Due to this people are losing faith in the system, ability of law enforcement agencies to maintain order and enforce the rule of law and to provide justice. In spite of the failures and derailment of the democratic system, India has survived and made progress due to the resilience of its people.
Politicians, devoid of a record of service, sacrifice and a mass base, need money and muscle power to keep their positions of power and to bludgeon their constituency into submission. Here there are many innocent people who are held guilty only because of the malicious act of few hypocrites. Politicians have become the refuge of black marketers, corrupt and the means, to wield influence and for personal exaltation. Our leaders are law into themselves. Politician of these days are eager to use their expertise and time for nation building, in making them self rich and dominate the officials and law abiding citizens.
Criminalization of police is an extremely serious problem, which has already reached dangerous levels. Implanting mechanisms to assure accountability of the police to the public it serves did not become priority, as it should have, which creates direct affect on the rule of law. The police system should be characterized as a regime force, which places the needs of politicians or powerful individuals over the demands of the rule of law and the needs of citizens. In the performance of their duty, law enforcement officials shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold the human rights of all persons. It requires the police to uphold the rule of law, ensure safety of citizens, be responsible, accountable and protect democratic values.
It is painful to say that the activity of the police these days are meted out against the marginalized sections of the society. Almost everywhere, minorities and vulnerable groups such as the poor and women, experience a more crushing weight of police activity.
It is well known that the democratic governance would also require that the police force, described as the most visible arm of the states authority , reflects the norms and the ethos that people perceive as aimed at their common good. It was observed in the case that the officers charged with maintenance of law and order can use only that much force as in necessary for disposal of an unlawful assembly and suppression of riot. This principle had emerged from the common law. The police, who are the gate keepers of the mighty criminal justice system and the bureaucracy, who are the dispensers of welfare measures to the society, are going to any extend of cruelty and ill deeds to amass wealth and get promotions.
It is being urged that the immediate inquiry into the activity of the police should be made so that their arbitrary action remain under control and they don’t break the order of the rule of law which has prevailed for so long period. Everyone is in rush without any kind of concern for the rest wanting to be first, whether it is on the road or in any other walk of life to carve out short cuts for them to pass through and a psyche to justify their wrongs with an expectation only for others to follow the law and wait for the day when all other subject themselves to the rule of law so that they could follow suit. There is no initiative by the government to check such a breach.



2 comments:

  1. Yes here police means butchers. To prevent the police from overstepping their boundaries and transforming from protectors into oppressors, it is necessary to examine the fundamental role of the police. In essence, the police exist to enforce the law and in turn safeguard the rights of citizens of state which are enshrined in the country’s laws. Therefore granting the police extended powers is to ensure that the rights of the citizens are more effectively protected. However, in many cases, this seems to have been overlooked. In its haste to capture terrorists and stamp out terrorism, the administration has discreetly endorsed unconstitutional crime-combating techniques such as physical and mental torture. The reasoning behind this is that personal privacy and freedom have to be set aside to save lives. While I accept that the police require a greater package of measures to combat terrorism, such logic escapes me, as it seems to be committing a crime just to prevent another. By granting the police unlimited powers, it is inevitable that such dilemmas pertaining to civil rights will crop up. It is best therefore, to keep reasonable limits on police power, while jealously guarding and protecting our fundamental rights to freedom and privacy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete